Recently in State Theatre Films Category

The Lives of Others: Questions for Reflection

| 16 Comments | 0 TrackBacks
Christa-Maria tells Wiesler that he is a good man. Jerska gives Dreymann Sonata for a Good Man. Dreymann dedicates Sonata for a Good Man to Wiesler. What is "a good man" in The Lives of Others? Was it possible to be a good man in East Berlin? Do we need a different language/vocabulary to describe these men? Does this film have a hero? Was it possible to be heroic in East Berlin? 

Does art have the power to make us good people? The director offers us plenty of evidence that artists are more sensitive, more compassionate, more empathetic. But he also offers us plenty of evidence that art does not make us better people. Before the Second World War, Germans were considered the most cultured people on the planet. Why are people who worship art capable of barbaric behavior? Why do we study art? Does it have the power to change us? Is Hempf correct? Are people incapable of change? 

Why is Martina Gedeck given the name Christa-Maria? Why is her code name, Marta? Does the film have a religious dimension? 

Why does Wiesler attempt to help Dreymann? Is he in love with Dreymann? Is he in love with Christa? Does Christa need to be sacrificed for the sake of Dreymann? 


The Third Man: Questions for Reflection

| 16 Comments | 0 TrackBacks
The novelist E.M. Forster wrote "If I had to choose between betraying my country and betraying my friend, I hope I should have the guts to betray my country." What does The Third Man have to say about betraying one's friend? Is the betrayal of a friend always inexcusable? Are there more important loyalties - to one's country? One's family? One's religion? Etc. 

Anna and Holly have very different responses to Harry Lime's crimes. How do you account for their different reactions? Why does Anna choose not to leave Vienna? Why does she choose not to benefit from the capture of Harry? What do we know about Anna's life during the war? What do we know about Holly's? Do their different experiences of the war affect their responses to Harry? 

What do you make of the film's final shot?

Why does Holly write Westerns? Will he continue to write Westerns after his time in Vienna? 

Critics have often said that the city of Vienna is a character in The Third Man. How is the city used as not only a setting but as a character? 


Citizen Kane: Questions for Reflection

| 19 Comments | 0 TrackBacks
Citizen Kane is filmed as a series of long takes, composed in-depth to eliminate the necessity for narrative cutting within major dramatic scenes. The film uses very little shot/counter-shot. Why is this so important to the way we experience the film visually? 

Why is this important to the content of the film? 

Do the multiple perspectives bring us closer to or further away from the truth? 

Do the individual narratives distinctively differ? Are they all Welles/Toland's visions or do they show individual narrators' perspectives? 

Do the perspectives of the individual narrators always make sense? That is, would Susan know the content of her own narrative? Would Jed have access to the information in his narrative? 

Do the narratives work with each other or contradict each other? 

Do the more subjective narratives support or refute the newsreel? 

Does the answer to Rosebud tell us anything? everything? nothing? 

Why don't we get to see the reporters' faces? 

This week's installment in the Ethical Dilemmas on Film series is the 2001 Jill Sprecher film Thirteen Conversations About One Thing. Here are some questions to get you started in your thinking about the film:

What is the "one thing"? 

Can you figure out the actual chronology of events? Why is the film told in the particular order that it is? 

Is there such a thing as a coincidence in this film? 

Does the film prove that reversibility is impossible? 

What does the film have to say about Schadenfreude? 

The film takes place in New York City. Is this surprising to realize? 

A motif is a recurring subject, theme, idea, form, shape, or figure in a work of art. Does Thirteen Conversations rely on any particular motifs? 

Is there a particular character with whom you identify or sympathize? Is this identification or sympathy surprising to you? 

The Nun's Story: Questions for Reflection

| 21 Comments | 0 TrackBacks
The Nun's Story is about the possibility of achieving perfection. What would it mean to be a perfect human being? Would your version of a perfect human being resemble the woman Sister Luke attempts to become? 

Should human beings aspire to be perfect? Should Christians aspire to be like Christ? Are either of these possible? 

Why must Sister Luke shed her personality and her memories in order to achieve perfection? 

One critic has written that unlike other films about religion, "this film does not treat the audience as the choir that will receive the preaching." How does The Nun's Story treat its audience? 

The Nun's Story has been compared to a war movie - "the near military discipline of the novices, trained to proclaim their guilt for breaking the rules and abase themselves in penance, has the psychological reality of enduring boot camp." Is this a fair comparison? How is violence conveyed in this film? Does the movie embrace religion? Attack religion? Is the religious life "against nature"? 

Is Sister Luke fighting her own nature in order to be a nun? 


The Crying Game: Questions for Reflection

| 16 Comments | 0 TrackBacks
Crying_game_poster.jpgThis week's selection for Ethical Dilemmas on Film is the 1992 Neil Jordan film The Crying Game. Here are some questions to focus your reflection on the various ethically relevant themes this work addresses:

Does The Crying Game fit into any particular genre? 

What's the purpose of the frog/scorpion story? 

In how many ways does the film play with the issue of identity? 

Why does Miranda Richardson have the name Jude? Why does Stephen Rea have the name Fergus? 

Why does Fergus begin to change his mind about Jody? 

How does Jordan play with diegetic and extra-diegetic music? 

Why does he choose the music that he does - especially "Stand By Your Man" and "When a Man Loves a Woman"? 

Sunset Blvd.: Questions for Reflection

| 23 Comments | 0 TrackBacks
SunsetBoulevardfilmposter.jpg
This week's installment in the "Ethical Dilemmas on Film" Series at the State Theatre is the 1950 film noir classic Sunset Boulevard. Here are some things to consider as you reflect on the film:

Many critics consider Sunset Blvd. to be the best Hollywood film about Hollywood. What does the film have to tell us about Hollywood? 

Billy Wilder was a European émigré who knew barely any English when he arrived in the States. Is Wilder's status as a foreigner/outsider evident in the film? 

What elements of Joe's narration indicate that he's a screenwriter? Can we tell how good a screenwriter he is from his narration? Does he finally write that successful script? 

Is Joe better as an actor than a writer? 

Why is Norma writing a script about Salome? 

Is it worth following up Joe's reference to Great Expectations

Europa, Europa: Fragen zum Nachdenken

| 22 Comments | 0 TrackBacks
Thumbnail image for Europa_europa_us_release_poster.jpg
This week's installment in the Ethical Dilemmas on Film series is Europa, Europa, a 1990 film directed byAgnieszka Holland. The film was adapted from the autobiography of Solomon Perel, a Jewish man from Germany who survived World War II as a boy by hiding his identity from the Nazis. The original title of the film, Hitlerjunge Salomon (literally, Hitler Youth Salomon), provides more of a clue to the specific kinds of peril involved in Perel's struggle than does the less descriptive title under which the film was released. Here are some questions to get you started in your reflection on the ethical issues raised in the film.

How many times in how many ways does Solly escape?

    
Why does Agnieszka Holland begin Solly's story the way she does? What is the effect of the opening scenes? What do we learn about Solly's family during these scenes? 

How does this film differ from other films you've seen about the Holocaust? Why do you prefer Europa, Europa? Or why do you prefer Schindler's List, Sophie's Choice, The Diary of Anne Frank, Life is Beautiful, The Pianist, Holocaust, etc.? 


Six Degrees of Separation: Questions for Consideration

| 19 Comments | 0 TrackBacks
6degreesposter.jpg

This week's installment in the Ethical Dilemmas on Film series is the 1993 film adaptation of the John Guare play Six Degrees of Separation. In addition to spawning the game that would put a certain actor at the hub of all cosmic intersections, the film touches on a number of issues that are worthy of our consideration. Here are some questions and suggestions to get you started in your thinking about the film:
 
Six Degrees of Separation was written and first performed as a play. How can you tell? Why does it matter? 

Why is Jeffrey from South Africa? 

What is the importance of the Kandinsky painting? 

Think about these lines: 

    • "I'm trying to keep this abstract." 
    • "I still don't fully understand how this came about or the sequence in which it came about." 
    • "That everything can be blamed on a bad childhood just doesn't hold water." 
    • The imagination = "what is most uniquely us." 
    • "Safe." 
    • "Imagination is not our escape. On the contrary it's the place we're all trying to get to." 

The Best Man: Questions for Consideration

| 19 Comments | 0 TrackBacks
Best_man.jpg
In the 1964 screen adaptation of Gore Vidal's play, The Best Man, William RUSSELL quotes the philosopher Bertrand RUSSELL early in the film. Here is the complete quotation from Bertrand Russell: 

Our great democracies still tend to think that a stupid man is more likely to be honest than a clever man, and our politicians take advantage of this prejudice by pretending to be even more stupid than nature made them. 

(Bertrand Russell, New Hopes for a Changing World)

What do you think? 

Is there a relationship between honesty and intelligence? 

Does our political system tend to favor stupidity or intelligence? 

Do voters in The Best Man distrust Bill Russell because of his intelligence? 

Do they trust Joe Cantwell because he isn't as bright? 

How does the film show us that Cantwell does not have Russell's intellect?

If Bertrand Russell was right about most voters, is he wrong about Gore Vidal? 

Is Vidal taking a position on honesty and intelligence? Does his script have a readable message?

This movie was made in 1964. Would the evidence Bill Russell has against Joe Cantwell work to Russell's advantage or disadvantage in 2012? Would the evidence Cantwell has against Russell work to Cantwell's advantage or disadvantage?