I. Introduction
Climate change as a global challenge has evolved through a series of stages in the last few decades. We are now all on the brink of a new era that will see the terms of debate shift once again. The different eras are characterized by the scientific evidence, public perceptions, responses and engagement of different groups to address the problem.
In the first era, from the late 1980s to 2000, climate change was seen as an "environmental" problem to do with prevention of future impacts on the planets climate system over the next 5200 years, through reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases, known as "mitigation uncorked."
The second era can be said to have started around the turn of the millennium, with the recognition that there will be some unavoidable impacts on climate change in the near term (over the next decade or two). These impacts must be coped with through "adaptation" as well as mitigation to prevent much more severe and possibly catastrophic impacts in the longer term. It became clear that many of the impacts of climate change in the near term are likely to fall on the poorest countries and communities.
The third era, which we are just about to enter, will see the issue change from tackling an environmental or development problem to a question of "global justice." This next phase will engage with a much wider array of citizens from around the world than previous eras.
II. First Climate Change Era
The first era can be dated from the preparation of the publication of the first assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), set up in 1988, which alerted the world to the problem of the runaway greenhouse effect. This was predicted to occur sometime in the 21st century, if emissions of man-made greenhouse gases continued unabated at current rates. The IPCC assessment was based on computer models of the Earth's atmosphere and the physics of heat entrapment by a number of gases, principally carbon dioxide, from burning of fossil fuels like coal, petroleum and natural gas. This led to the governments of the world agreeing to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in 1992 at the Rio Earth Summit, whereby all signatory countries accepted the problem and agreed to take measures to reduce their emissions. They also recognized that the rich countries (listed by name in the annex of the UNFCCC and hence known as Annex 1 countries) were the countries principally responsible for past emissions and would take action first.
In 1995, the IPCC published its second assessment report which highlighted the fact that despite pledges to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases, emissions were continuing to rise and would result in severe impacts if nothing was done to cut them. This in turn led to the negotiation of the Kyoto Protocol to the UNFCC, which was agreed to at the third conference of the parties (COP3) to the convention in Kyoto Japan in 1997. This committed signatory countries to targets for reducing emissions by an agreed amount by the end of the first commitment period in 2012, after which the targets would become more stringent. Developing countries do not have to accept any targets for emissions reductions in the first commitment period, but would make commitments after 2012.
During this era, climate change was seen principally seen as an environment a problem to do with the global atmosphere, and the people involved were scientists and national environmental policy makers. The solution was also seen in terms of prevention of impacts that would occur in the distant future.
III. The Second Era
The start of this era can be traced to 2001 with the publication of the IPCC's third assessment report, which, for the first time, alerted the world to the unavoidable impacts of human-induced climate change in the near term (the next decade or two). The report thus raised the need to cope with impacts through "adaptation." It also pointed out that impacts would not be uniform across the globe, but that poor countries and poor communities in all countries would be vulnerable and would need assistance to adapt.
In policy terms, this led to the Marrakech Accords agreed at the seventh conference of the parties (COP-7) held in Marrakech, Morocco in 2001, where a number of new funds were created to help poor countries to adapt. These included the least developed countries fund (LDC) as well the a special climate change fund (SCCF). It also highlighted the connection between adaptation to the impacts of climate change and development on the ground, especially in the water, agriculture, disaster preparedness and coastal management sectors.
At this time, the perception of the problem shifted to include the need to see climate change not just as environmental issue but also as a growing threat to development. Thus, a wider range of people became engaged with the issue including the NGO and development communities with solutions sought not only in mitigation but also in necessary adaptation.
IV. The Third Era
While the characterization of the previous two eras, as described above, will be widely accepted by many, the third era is more contested. This era was sparked with the publication of the Stern Review in late 2006 (carried out for the UK Treasury,) and the IPCC's fourth assessment report in April of 2007. Both reports demonstrate that climate event change is already happening. While it may not be possible to attribute a single climate change event such as hurricane Katrina which struck New Orleans in 2005 to human-induced climate change, the accumulation of evidence of major climate-related occurrences is a very strong signal that human-induced climate change is already happening. Examples include glacial ice melt in Greenland, heat waves in Europe, droughts in Africa, floods in Asia and hurricanes in the Caribbean. The cost of adopting low-carbon technologies are now recognized as insignificant in comparison to the risks of massive and catastrophic climate changes if we do nothing.
A shift is happening in the way climate change is perceived from just an environmental issue, or even an environmental and development issue, to one of global justice or more correctly global injustice. One group of people (namely those that consume the most, particularly in wealthier countries) have caused the problem, and another group in people (namely poor people, especially in poorer countries) will suffer the brunt of the adverse consequences in the near term.
Thus, the issue goes beyond mitigation alone, though mitigation is urgent to prevent even greater and more catastrophic problems in fifty years time. And it goes beyond adaptation, such as helping people prepare for the unavoidable impacts in the next few decades. A major challenge now is to find ways to compensate people for the damage that has already been done.
The new characterization of the climate change problem binds every single person on the planet together, as each human has a "carbon footprint" which is contributing to the problem, although the size of individual footprints varies by many orders of magnitude. Everyone has a responsibility to reduce their emissions commensurate with their footprint, while seeking to offset what cannot be reduced. The germ of the solution to climate change must grow from each individual taking responsibility not only to reduce their own individual impacts but also to urge leaders to choose policies and actions that will enable a stable and just planet.
* Note an earlier version of this article was first published in 2006 by the International Institute for Environment and Development in "Sustainable Development Opinion."
By:
Saleem Huq
Head, Climate Change Group
International Institute for Environment and Development
3 Endsleigh Street, London WC1H 0DD
and
Camilla Toumlin
IIED Director
International Institute for Environment and Development
3 Endsleigh Street, London WC1H 0DD
Leave a comment